"We eat animals because they taste good"
. . . and other arguments in a spirited debate over the ethics of killing animals for food, fur, and/or leather.
Environmental law * natural resources law * agricultural law * food and drug law * biotechnology * law and neuroscience * behavioral psychology and evolutionary biology * health law * bioethics
A member of the Jurisdynamics Network
SEC. 33. LIMITATIONS ON ISSUANCE OF PATENTSNo one yet knows what "directed to or encompassing a human organism" means. The United States Patent and Trademark Office will have the first opportunity to apply this restriction as the initial arbiter of patent applications. Inevitably, the federal courts will weigh in to provide more authoritative interpretations. Eventually, Congress may have to amend this provision to clarify it. Meanwhile, the inclusion of this restriction on patenting "a human organism" directly within the patent statute strongly signals that at least some biotechnological advances have unsettled both Congress and the President.
(a) LIMITATION.-Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no patent may issue on a claim directed to or encompassing a human organism.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.-
(1) IN GENERAL.-Subsection (a) shall apply to any application for patent that is pending on, or filed on or after, the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) PRIOR APPLICATIONS.-Subsection (a) shall not affect the validity of any patent issued on an application to which paragraph (1) does not apply.